HD Radio, for real?

[ image courtesy of dctourism / Flickr ]

It is a big day today for radio.

The FCC is meeting, as I type. On the agenda for the day a vote for final approval of IBOC [aka HD Radio.] This vote has been pending for many, many months. Last year it was delayed due to a vote on a major telecom merger, and the year before they were busy dealing with the aftermath of Katrina.

Public comments have been gathered from individuals and groups: Station Resource Group, the Future of Music Coalition, this coalition of disparate groups, and many others. Each has laid out their case in hopes of getting approval from the FCC on this matter.

What does it mean for the radio industry? There is thinking in some corners that taking HD Radio out of the chains of “experimental” and into the realm of law will encourage the now skittish equipment manufacturers to delve deeper into R&D and manufacture of HD Radio gear. That line of thought makes sense–HD Radio propoents up to this point have been operating on the assumption that it would all get approved by the FCC as a licensable broadcast method. That is a big gamble, indeed. [However, other industries operate within that sort of world all of the time, e.g. pharmaceuticals.]

Who knows, perhaps today’s likely approval will cause a bloom in HD Radio equipment, marketing, and adoption.

Or perhaps not…

One thought on “HD Radio, for real?

  1. “Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check”

    “While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse.”


    “What kind of digital radio are listeners searching for?”


    “HD Radio on the Offense”

    “But after an investigation of HD Radio units, the stations playing HD, and the company that owns the technology; and some interviews with the wonks in DC, it looks like HD Radio is a high-level corporate scam, a huge carny shill.”


    “RW Opinion: Rethinking AM’s future”

    “Making AM-HD work well as a long-term investment is seen as an expensive and risky challenge for most stations and their owners. With the bulk of successful AMs airing news, talk and sports, the improved fidelity advantage of HD and stereo seem only marginally attractive. There is the significant downside of potential new interference to some of their own AM analog listeners as well as listeners of adjacent-channel stations. And of course we still have no nighttime authority for AM-HD.”


    The HD Radio Alliance’s 50KW-owned clear channel stations cause so much adjacent-channel interference on AM-HD, that nighttime AM-HD is not authorized, and blocks out smaller stations; the FCC may authorize nighttime AM-HD on 3/22/07.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *